Unions create a more
stable, productive workforce—where workers have a say in improving their jobs.
Statistics bear this out. According to Professor Harley Shaiken of the
University of California-Berkeley unions are associated with higher productivity, lower employee turnover, improved workplace communication, and a better-trained workforce.
There is a substantial amount of
academic literature backing Shaiken on the following benefits of unions and
unionization to employers and the economy:
- Strong Middle Class Linked to Strong Unions
- Productivity
- Product or service delivery and quality
- Training
- Turnover
- Solvency of the firm
- Workplace health and safety
- Economic development
Economic Growth
Between 1945 and 1973, when a high
percentage of workers were in unions, wages kept pace with rising productivity,
prosperity was widely shared and economic growth—and America’s middle class—was
strong. Since 1973, the number of of people in unions have declined, causing
real wages to stagnate, even though workers’ productivity has steadily risen. [2]
Productivity
According to a recent
survey of 73 independent studies on unions and productivity: “The available
evidence points to a positive and statistically significant association between
unions and productivity in the U.S. manufacturing and education sectors, of
around 10 and 7 percent, respectively.”[3]
Some scholars have found an even
larger positive relationship between unions and productivity. According to Brown and Medoff, “unionized
establishments are about 22 percent more productive than those that are not.”[4]Professors Michael Ash and
Jean Ann Seago [5]say heart attack recovery
rates are higher in hospitals where nurses are in unions than in hospitals without
unions. According to Professor Paul
Clark, nurses, through their unions, improve patient care by negotiating
contracts that raise staff-to-patient ratios, limit excessive overtime and improving
nurse training. [6]
Training
Several studies in have
found a positive link between unionization and the amount and quality of
workforce training. Unionized workplaces are more likely to offer formal
trainingand this is especially true for small firms. Workers,
through their unions, often negotiate contracts that include training, and unions
often hold their own training.
Turnover
Shaiken also finds that
unions reduce turnover. He cites Freeman
and Medoff’s finding that “about one-fifth of the union productivity effect
stemmed from lower worker turnover.
Unions improve communication channels giving workers the ability to
improve their conditions short of ‘exiting.”
Solvency
Academic research refutes
the claim that unions are detrimental to
business. According to Professors Richard Freeman and Morris Kleiner, unionism
has a statistically insignificant effect (meaning no effect) on a firm’s
solvency Freeman and Kleiner conclude that “unions
do not, on average, drive firms or business lines out of business or produce
high displacement rates for unionized workers.”
Workplace Health and Safety
According
to an American Rights at Work summary of a study by John E. Baugher and J. Timmons
Roberts:
“Only one factor
effectively moves workers who are in subordinate positions to actively cope
with hazards: membership in an independent labor union. These findings suggest that union growth
could indirectly reduce job stress by giving workers the voice to cope
effectively with job hazards.
Economic Development
Unions play a positive role
in economic development. One good example is the Wisconsin Regional Training
Partnership, “an association of 125 employers and unions dedicated to
family-supporting jobs in a competitive business environment. WRTP members have
stabilized manufacturing employment in the Milwaukee metro area, and
contributed about 6,000 additional industrial jobs to it over the past five
years. Among member firms, productivity is way up--exceeding productivity
growth in nonmember firms.”
Charles Brown and James L. Medoff, “Trade Unions in the Production Process.” Journal of Political
Economy, vol. 86, no. 3 (June 1978): 355–378.
Saul A. Rubinstein, “The Impact of Co-Management on Quality Performance: The Case of the Saturn Corporation.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 197 (January 2000).
Richard B. Freeman and Morris M. Kleiner, “Do Unions Make Enterprises Insolvent?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 52, no. 4 (July 1999): 510–527.
Annette Bernhardt, Laura Dresser, and Joel Rogers, “Taking the High Road in Milwaukee: The Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership.” Working USA, Vol. 5, Issue 3 (January 31, 2002).